Features

How to avoid 'labelling' children

Emma Davis explores why labelling children can limit learning and jeopardise self esteem, and why it is in opposition to the 'unique child'.

Although as adults we assume labels such as mother, father, grandchild, friend, aunt or employee, these labels are not related to our intellectual ability. However, for children in education, even in early years, labels are used to categorise them according to their ability. Labels including ‘more able’, ‘gifted’, ‘high ability’, ‘under-achieving’, ‘not at the expected level’ and many other variations are commonplace in settings and schools. Not to mention Pupil Premium, Special Educational Needs and English as an Additional Language. This raises the question about the purpose of these labels and whom they are for.

The notion of labelling children using ability-focused language is in conflict with the whole essence of the ‘unique child’, which is embedded in the Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS). This statutory legislation acknowledges that all children develop at different rates, and it is our responsibility to ensure our practices and policies reflect this. To emphasise this, the Statutory framework states…

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Nursery World and making use of our archive of more than 35,000 expert features, subject guides, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Unlimited access to news and opinion

  • Email newsletter providing activity ideas, best practice and breaking news

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here