Features

To the Point - Who speaks for centres?

Will the storm clouds of protest gather over the closure of children's centres, as more local authorities announce cuts? So far, demonstrations have been isolated affairs, bringing out anxious and angry parents to defend individual centres threatened with closure or deep budget cuts.

Parents in Stoke saved seven centres from closure, while the Daycare Trust and netmums are starting to mobilise more widely. But nothing has yet materialised on the scale of the visceral opposition to the sell-off of England's forests. Nor have the children's centre campaigns found their Philip Pullman. The celebrated author's eloquent, passionate and often scathing denunciation of Oxfordshire County Council's plans to close many of its libraries has become a viral internet hit.

This surprises me. I always thought that children's centres had, in a very short period of time, put deep roots down in popular sensibility and attachment. The fact that middle class parents use Sure Start centres - commonly cited by Conservatives as a distortion of their original purpose - seemed to me a very good guarantee that they would be protected against cuts. Political theory textbooks tell us that those parts of the welfare state used by the middle classes are the hardest for cutters to reach: services for poor people become poor services, as the saying goes, but not those in which a majority of the population has a stake.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Nursery World and making use of our archive of more than 35,000 expert features, subject guides, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Unlimited access to news and opinion

  • Email newsletter providing activity ideas, best practice and breaking news

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here