News

Knock-on effects

What bedevils a nursery market where under-occupied settings are being forced to close, while others thrive? Simon Vevers looks at the forces behind the changes Atale of three private nurseries: the first has been going ten years, has an occupancy rate of around 98 per cent and a two-year waiting list for its out-of-school club; the second is a neighbourhood nursery turned children's centre with 80 per cent occupancy and a waiting list for babies; the third is sandwiched between Sure Start programmes in a deprived area and occupancy lurches perilously between anything from 20 to 50 per cent.

Atale of three private nurseries: the first has been going ten years, has an occupancy rate of around 98 per cent and a two-year waiting list for its out-of-school club; the second is a neighbourhood nursery turned children's centre with 80 per cent occupancy and a waiting list for babies; the third is sandwiched between Sure Start programmes in a deprived area and occupancy lurches perilously between anything from 20 to 50 per cent.

The nurseries have not been plucked at random to reflect geographical differences. In fact, they are all in Hull, Yorkshire, and all owned by Happykidz proprietor Anita Anderson. But they encapsulate the way in which some nurseries are thriving on unfulfilled demand, while competition from Government-backed initiatives is having serious knock-on effects on the viability of others.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Nursery World and making use of our archive of more than 35,000 expert features, subject guides, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Unlimited access to news and opinion

  • Email newsletter providing activity ideas, best practice and breaking news

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here