The House of Lords voted against a proposal to abolish the legal defence of 'reasonable chastisement', following a three- line whip imposed by both the Labour and Conservative parties.
But voting was 226 to 91 in favour of a compromise amendment that bans parents from giving a smack that causes bruises, reddening of the skin or mental harm.
NSPCC director and chief executive Mary Marsh said the amendment would not fully protect children. 'It still sends out a dangerous and misleading message that violence towards children is safe and acceptable.
'Complete abolition of the reasonable chastisement defence law is the only reasonable way forward. Half-hearted law reform, which defines an acceptable threshold of violence towards children, won't work.'
Register now to continue reading
Thank you for visiting Nursery World and making use of our archive of more than 35,000 expert features, subject guides, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:
What's included
-
Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month
-
Unlimited access to news and opinion
-
Email newsletter providing activity ideas, best practice and breaking news
Already have an account? Sign in here