News

Standing their ground

An Ofsted report that finds fault with the Foundation Stage Profile is causing consternation in the early years field. Mary Evans hears from the defending side Leading figures in the early years sector responded more in sorrow than in anger to Ofsted's report criticising the Foundation Stage Profile, describing the document as unhelpful and its timing as unfortunate.

Leading figures in the early years sector responded more in sorrow than in anger to Ofsted's report criticising the Foundation Stage Profile, describing the document as unhelpful and its timing as unfortunate.

Supporters of the Foundation Stage and its assessment mechanism argue that the survey is based on a small sample when the profile was new and that many of the issues it raises are being addressed.

However, there is annoyance at the headline-grabbing press release publicising Transition from the Reception Year to Year One - an evaluation by HMI. The comment by Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Schools David Bell that the profile 'is bureaucratic and time-consuming and fails to provide parents and teachers with the inform- ation they need,' was denounced as nonsense by its supporters. Mr Bell's call for the Department for Education and Skills and the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority to look at the report closely because 'in its current form the Foundation Stage Profile does not fit the bill' was seen as unwarranted.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Nursery World and making use of our archive of more than 35,000 expert features, subject guides, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Unlimited access to news and opinion

  • Email newsletter providing activity ideas, best practice and breaking news

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here