
The judgement makes clear that all future cases can take it ‘as fact’ that women are more likely to suffer a disadvantage as a result of childcare responsibilities than men.
The original case was brought by Gemma Dobson, a working mother of three children, whose employer tried to demand she move to frequently changing shift patterns, which were impossible to manage alongside childcare. Given her caring responsibility – two of her children were disabled - she could not do the changed hours and she was dismissed as a result.
Working Families intervened in the Employment Appeal Tribunal to protect the rights of women from being discriminated against at work because of the ‘childcare disparity’.
Emily Pritty, head of legal services at Working Families, said, ‘Today’s judgement is hugely welcome news for working mothers who contact our helpline, many of whose employers have tried to impose changed terms or have lost their jobs because of their caring responsibilities.
‘Going forward, this is vital clarity for the many cases of indirect sex discrimination where employers attempt to force changes that make childcare impossible and have the effect of forcing women out of their jobs.’
Register now to continue reading
Thank you for visiting Nursery World and making use of our archive of more than 35,000 expert features, subject guides, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:
What's included
-
Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month
-
Unlimited access to news and opinion
-
Email newsletter providing activity ideas, best practice and breaking news
Already have an account? Sign in here