Opinion

Editor's View - Is it worth waging war on the Government's refusal to change reception class ratios?

The tricky position of reception classes in the Early Years Foundation Stage has been highlighted again in the Government's response to the EYFS consultation and in news from Sutton, where the local authority wants to increase reception class sizes to 32.

There were obviously many concerns raised by respondents to the EYFS consultation, particularly about the learning goals and assessment, but a significant number expressed worry about the 1:30 ratio in reception year. The Government, however, says that it does not propose to change the exisiting requirements.

Reception ratios have long been a contentious issue. As consultant Julie Cigman points out on the Nursery World LinkedIn discussion on this subject, how can we have truly observation-led teaching and provision, or support play and child-initiated learning under this system? And how can the key person approach possibly work effectively?

Sutton's intention to challenge the 30 class size limit, to provide much-needed extra places without expensive building programmes, raises the prospect of worse to come. And budget cuts mean that teaching assistant time is being reduced, which will also hit reception class provision.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Nursery World and making use of our archive of more than 35,000 expert features, subject guides, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Unlimited access to news and opinion

  • Email newsletter providing activity ideas, best practice and breaking news

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here