Opinion

Opinion: Editor's View - Childcare is a better case for subsidy than many other expenses

There is no shortage of Conservative MPs and MEPs attracting attention and censure over their parliamentary expenses claims.

Yet it is Tory party chairman Caroline Spelman's payments to a nanny who may or may not have also worked as a constituency secretary that seem to be provoking most criticism.

It is astonishing that the ex-chief whip in Brussels, Den Dover, could pay his wife and daughter around £750,000 quite legitimately (although it was embarrassing enough for him to lose his job anyway), while Ms Spelman will have broken the rules if she is found to have paid for childcare rather than secretarial help.

Parliamentary staffing allowances are intended only for work deemed directly relevant to serving as an MP, and childcare is not viewed as such, while answering letters and filing documents is.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Nursery World and making use of our archive of more than 35,000 expert features, subject guides, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Unlimited access to news and opinion

  • Email newsletter providing activity ideas, best practice and breaking news

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here