Opinion

Sarah Mackenzie: 'There are pros and cons with every type of provision'

There has been a recent rise in negative commentary about large nursery chains – but let’s not succumb to or promote division, says Sarah Mackenzie
Sarah Mackenzie: 'Taking shots at nursery groups is flawed'
Sarah Mackenzie: 'Taking shots at nursery groups is flawed'

Division slows progress, standing in the way of collaboration and innovation. Division diverts time, energy and efforts away from finding and uniting around solutions.

Pre-Covid, it wasn’t unusual to see one type of early years provision pitted against another. On the one hand, nursery groups were sometimes painted as prioritising profit over people, championing corporate priorities over children’s needs. On the other, sole providers operating as one nursery, pre-school or childminder were sometimes painted as lacking professionalism, as behind the curve on requirements, research and rigour.

This binary division is at best biased and at worst divisive. During the pandemic and immediately after it, I thought we had moved beyond that. All in the storm together, albeit in different boats, but stronger together. Now I see a resurgence in opinion pieces reinforcing that binary division and taking shots at nursery groups.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Nursery World and making use of our archive of more than 35,000 expert features, subject guides, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Unlimited access to news and opinion

  • Email newsletter providing activity ideas, best practice and breaking news

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here